Lenovo: Mobile will be 10-20% of Revenue in 5 Years

Posted on April 19th, 2010 in Social Media | Comments Off

PC maker Lenovo announced today that the company expects its mobile Internet products to account for 10%-20% of revenue in five years' time. This statement comes from President and COO, Rory Read, delivered at a media briefing that coincided with the launch of the newest Lenovo "LePhone" smartphone device in China. With the phone, a handset running the Google Android mobile OS, Lenovo hopes to grab a good-sized chunk of the still-emerging Chinese smartphone market. Sponsor Interestingly enough, Lenovo had, in early 2008, sold off its mobile phone unit to focus solely on its PC business. But as the financial crisis hit, companies delayed refreshing their corporate desktops and laptops in an effort to save money, a move which heavily impacted Lenovo's bottom line. Last year, the company decided to once again diversify their offerings by bringing back the mobile unit. In January, Lenovo launched an improved "Ophone" device at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, its first smartphone since the $200 million reacquisition of the once-discarded mobile business, returned to the company in November of last year. At the time, Lenovo execs said the phone would be central to the company's mobile strategy. Today, they're echoing that sentiment. According to Chief Executive Yang Yuanqing, mobile Internet devices will overtake traditional PCs in the next five years. And Read reminded everyone that the smartphone market in China was only now emerging. "It's just the beginning," he said. PC Manufacturers Focused on Mobile Lenovo isn't the only PC manufacturer making changes in this direction, with smartphone launches laser-focused on China especially. Dell, for example, announced in November they would launch an Android-based handset called the Dell Mini 3 that would be sold only in Brazil and China to start. The company is also hard at work on an Android tablet, a colorful consumer-targeted device apparently being called the "Dell Streak." Acer, too, has a line of smartphones running both the Windows Mobile OS and Android, available outside the U.S. in parts of Europe and Asia. HP, although still more focused on PCs, is set to launch its first "new-wave" tablet in the form of the HP Slate , a multi-touch lightweight device running Windows 7.

YouTube Streams IPL Cricket Live In U.S.

Posted on April 19th, 2010 in Social Media | Comments Off

When YouTube first started streaming Indian Premier League cricket at the beginning of March, it did so on a time delay for matches shown in the United States. Today, the streaming video service has announced that the matches have become so popular in the U.S. that there's no longer a need to wait - the games will be streamed live here as well. Sponsor According to YouTube's blog post, the Indian Premier League YouTube channel has had over 40 million views, with the United States accounting for the most views after only the most obvious location - India. While some seemed to say that the quality was subpar at the onset, you can't really argue with more than 40 million views just over a month after launch. And, as a New York Giants fan living in the great state of Texas, I would know first hand that even a grainy Internet broadcast can be better than nothing. Currently, YouTube's IPL channel is its first and only foray into live sports streaming and, being on YouTube, is available to iPhone users as well as other mobile users that can access the site. And, according to Forbes , the cricket league is big business, so we can only wonder what the next step here is. So, for you displaced sports fans like myself, the semi-finals begin in just over two days' time and will be streaming live on YouTube. Get to watchin'. Discuss

e0ef947842july07.png YouTube Streams IPL Cricket Live In U.S.

Original post:
YouTube Streams IPL Cricket Live In U.S.

Top 10 YouTube Videos About Mobile

Posted on April 17th, 2010 in Social Media | Comments Off

Have you seen the video that's a collection of Hollywood's most dramatic dead cellphone moments? From the very first cell phone TV commercial, to a T-Mobile publicity stunt, to children in Africa who mine the Coltan we use in our mobile devices, here's our collection of the top videos about mobile. Of these, far and away the most popular was a T-Mobile publicity stunt that auditioned 10,000 dancers and then filled up a Liverpool England street train station with 400 of them. The advert entitled "Dance" was part of T-Mobile's Life for Sharing campaign. Do you have a favorite video that makes mention of mobile? Let us know in the comments below. Sponsor Don't miss the ReadWriteWeb Mobile Summit on May 7th in Mountain View, California! The T-Mobile Dance 19,659,489 views iPhone Magic 7,736,528 views Boost Mobile Commercial Ft. Travis Barker 1,541,910 views Making of T-Mobile Dance 1,501,859 views 1989 - Centel - first cell phone ad! 507,735 views No Signal (and other cellular drama) 295,732 views In Focus: Congo's Bloody Coltan 130,855 views Stanford's Mobile Phone Orchestra and iPhone Ocarina 115,865 views Retro Commercial - Radio Shack Cell Phones - 1990 101,505 views The Evolution of Cell Phone 62,557 views We're at a key point in the history of mobile computing right now - we hope you'll join us, and a group of the most innovative leaders in the mobile industry, to discuss it. Don't miss the ReadWriteWeb Mobile Summit on May 7th in Mountain View, California! Discuss

8710d3e6b9e logo.jpg Top 10 YouTube Videos About Mobile

Original post:
Top 10 YouTube Videos About Mobile

Where Does Android Register on Google’s "Evil" Meter?

Posted on April 16th, 2010 in Social Media | Comments Off

As we mentioned briefly last night , Google is going to attempt to reintegrate Android into the main Linux kernel - the code had been booted in December because it was "no longer being cared for," according to Greg Kroah-Hartman, the Novell developer who maintains the staging, USB and driver core for Linux. The reintroduction process will take years , says Google open source programs manager Chris DiBona. On the one hand, it's good to see Google trying to do the right thing by the open source community, but on the other hand, the argument could be made that Google appropriated Linux for its own for-profit ends without giving back. Sponsor This move has been dubbed by some as "evil," (in reference to Google's infamous company motto, "Do No Evil"). The issue: Google forked Android's development into private branches, implemented a closed code review process and and then trademarked the "Android" name all while providing an incomplete public software developers kit which is missing several key items needed to build a Android-based handset. Open? No. But is that evil? The Arguments as to Android "Openness"...or Lack Thereof Vision Mobile's research director Andreas Constantinou makes these same points and more over on the blog run by the market analysis and strategy firm. The post, entitled " Is Android Evil? " is worth reading in its entirety. But we'll summarize some of the main points here by snipping out a handful of his top arguments as to why Android isn't really open source software: Private branches: As noted above, select partners (OEMs mostly) have access to private codelines that are estimated to be 6+ months ahead of the public SDK. This allows them to stay competitive. Close review process: All code reviewers work for Google. Few outside contributions get in with no explanation as to why. Speed of evolution: Google innovates on Android so quickly that OEMs have no choice but to remain close to the company in order to get in on the new features and bug fixes. Incomplete software: The public SDK lacks radio integration, international language packs and operator packs. Android is a trademarked name. Private roadmap: The published roadmap is a year out of date . You have to contact Google to see the private one. Constantinou makes a few other arguments, too, like how the Android Marketplace is controlled by Google for example, but that's not really as important to this issue - especially since there's no Apple-like review process when it comes to accepting new applications. Another argument to Android's not-so-open nature is that Google chose the Apache license so the derivative code doesn't have to be contributed back. Google's DiBona dismissed this, claiming differentiation is good and enables commercial vendors to succeed, according to the ZDNet report . Profit Isn't Evil Commercial success with Linux isn't a new (or "evil") idea, though. Distributions like Redhat, SuSE, Oracle Unbreakable Linux - heck, even Tivo - among many others have turned a profit thanks to Linux. That's not evil, that's just good business. But the issue here is that Google is succeeding commercially on top of Linux while making changes to Android that are not shared with the community. Meanwhile, they get to promote "Android" as "open," when, in reality, that doesn't appear to be the case. The question we ask now is this: does this make the Android business "evil?" Or does Google get a pass since Android is far more open, comparatively speaking, than most other mobile operating systems today? Where does Android fall on Google's "evil meter? in your eyes? Discuss

20d48a1db8%20toy.jpg Where Does Android Register on Googles "Evil" Meter?

Visit link:
Where Does Android Register on Google's "Evil" Meter?

Glympse: Real-Time, Private Location-Tracking May be the Winning Formula

Posted on April 16th, 2010 in Social Media | Comments Off

A Redmond-based startup is introducing a location-based social sharing service called Glympse . With a mobile application that works on iPhone, Android and Windows Mobile devices, users share their location (aka a "Glympse"), allowing their friends to see that location on another phone or on any other Internet-connected device. Senders can customize who gets to see the Glympse they post, whether the recipient is just one person, a group, or even everyone they've added as a friend on a social network like Facebook or Twitter. The interesting twist to this service isn't the location-sharing aspect, of course - there are dozens of companies that allow for that today - it's the service's real-time nature and the thoughtfully included privacy features. Using a patent-pending timer option, Glympse users specify how long their location is visible to which select group of friends, with a maximum time of four hours before the location data expires. Sponsor Location is Not a Game, It's a Utility Unlike the current crop of location-based social networking services (think Brightkite, Loopt, Gowalla, Foursquare, etc.), Glympse isn't designed to find nearby friends, share tips about local businesses or collect rewards for check-ins. It employs no game mechanics to encourage participation - that is, you aren't given badges or points the more you use it. You don't get to become the "mayor" of a place by checking in there the most, like you do in Foursquare. In fact, Glympse can hardly be called a "mobile social network" at all. Glympse is more like a utility, and that may what ensures its success long after everyone tires of "checking in" just because they can. There are a number of scenarios where Glympse may prove useful. Their PR team says they've seen its earliest users sharing locations related to cross-country road trips, marathons, paragliding flights and afternoons of skiing. Although those standout occasions may give Glympse a "wow" factor, it's in answering the everyday "where are you?" type questions where Glympse could prove be the most useful. In the "What is Glympse?" introductory video , the company says sending a Glympse is easier than making a call or sending a text. That's not necessarily true, though. Calls and texts are sent with the push of a button where Glympse requires a multi-step process that begins with installing the application on your mobile device, if supported . But as mentioned later in the video, many states have banned texting or making phone calls while driving. That's where Glympse comes in. Before you leave work, school or your home, you could send out a Glympse. For the time you specify, those permitted to see your location can track where you are at any given moment in real-time courtesy of your phone's GPS capabilities. Live Updating Maps and Privacy Features That's right - Glympse doesn't "check you in," it tracks you. Much like those pricey "family locator" cell phone add-on plans do, but for free. The service also addresses the privacy issues surrounding location-sharing, even going so far as to work with a safety group called ConnectSafely.org when designing the service. In Glympse, adding friends isn't an "all or nothing" endeavor. That is, you don't choose whether to just accept or reject friends. You accept friends, then group them accordingly ("family," "friends," "work," etc.). Later, when you're ready to share your location, you choose which group or groups should see it. Only want the spouse and kids to tune in? Share a Glympse with family. At a large conference where you want to meet up with colleagues? Send a Glympse to your "work" group. And so on. Facebook Integration: A Plus, Not the Selling the Point Much of the news coverage related to Glympse's launch has to do with its Facebook integration. That's an interesting option to be sure, especially since Facebook plans to announce their own location-sharing service later this month, according to reports. But whether or not Facebook users actually care to see the locations of their friends is another matter entirely. Many Facebook users simply use the network to catch up with friends and family they don't get to see every day by posting on their wall, chatting via Facebook's IM service and by browsing their shared photos, videos and links. Whether or not a friend is on their way to a meeting right now may be completely irrelevant information to these users. Like the intrusions from other apps and games, Glympse's Facebook updates - which come via a large, embedded map placed in the News Feed - could very well end up being hidden from view by Facebook users who simply aren't interested in seeing that sort of data. In other words, it's arguable that Glympse's Facebook (and Twitter) sharing features aren't necessarily the key selling points of its service. Real-time live data, the utility aspect of the tool itself and its built-in privacy features, however, are. Hopefully, mainstream users will understand that before mistakenly dismissing it as just another Facebook app clogging up their News Feed with noise. Discuss

glympse Glympse: Real Time, Private Location Tracking May be the Winning Formula

Visit link:
Glympse: Real-Time, Private Location-Tracking May be the Winning Formula