<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LSQHA Blog Reviews &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lsqha.com/tag/apple/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lsqha.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>GetGlue Adds New Releases to Recommendations Made by Human &amp; Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/getglue-adds-new-releases-to-recommendations-made-by-human-machine</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/getglue-adds-new-releases-to-recommendations-made-by-human-machine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[like-or-unlike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new-releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overwhelming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[really-eclectic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[things-it-finds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/getglue-adds-new-releases-to-recommendations-made-by-human-machine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It's hard to keep up with all the newly released movies and music these days, but a lightweight social network with a whole lot of smarts under the hood says it can now offer you personalized recommendations of new releases that suit your very particular interests. GetGlue is a semantic web browser plug-in that has, for years, been smart enough to recognize when you're looking at the same musical group across different websites, be that on Last.fm, MySpace or elsewhere. The service recently added a stream of recommendations of music, movies, books, magazines, wikipedia articles and other things you might like. How can it tell what you'll like when something is brand new, though? Today the service has launched a "new releases" section, where human editors rush to classify brand-new media. Then the semantic robots can serve it up to the right users, still hot out of the oven. It's pretty cool. Sponsor GetGlue founder Alex Iskold says he's learned a lesson similar to what formerly automated tech news aggregator Techmeme has learned: algorithms and user generated content can take you a long way, but there comes a point when it's good to hire some dedicated editors. The service asks you to like or unlike a wide variety of things. It then uses that feedback to build a taste profile to compare against things it finds put into its database and find the stuff it thinks you'll like. That's harder with new releases, though. "When something new is coming out, we don't know what it's like, so you need to have proffessionals tag it," Iskold told us. "We have two editors on staff who look across the spectrum of new releases each week. They draw the similarities between things in a deep way - the tagging system we use will be unvieled later. We use really eclectic tags to characterize what kind of zombie or vampire movie something is. We also use tags brought in from other systems and our users find cool new things really fast." The end result is a nicely displayed stream of big icons for personally recommended newly released movies, music and books. You think you're hip to your scene now? Wait until you've got a network of contacts, a semantic robot and real human editors all working together to bring you the freshest content in your weird little niche. To be honest, I've been testing it out today by switching from new album recommendations on Glue over to Apple's Lala.com , where it's easy to listen to full albums once for free. That's not the way Glue wants you to use it, but that's the way I like to use it so far. The Down Side It's an incredible system, when it works. GetGlue knows though that there are some challenges in this kind of game though. First, it's not easy to present this kind of flow of data to users without either overwhelming them or boring them. Many of GetGlue's latest changes are focused on making the user experience more pleasant: bigger images, collapsed bundles of shared items, etc. Can the service find a balance between giving you strong-enough recommendations on one hand and regularly offering up new recommendations on the other? In past versions of the product, I've received too few recommendations to keep me coming back. Hopefully new releases will scratch that itch. Iskold also says that after "liking" only 15 musical artists, I'm actually much less active than most of the 400,000 registered users of the service. Personally, I'm more drawn to the Wikipedia recommendations on GetGlue than anything else. The new releases in music might be roughly in the same sub-genres I usually listen to, but that doesn't mean they are any good. Finally, all this "liking" obviously begs the Facebook question. Writing as an ostensible Facebook competitor about that giant network's radical innovations unveiled last week, Iskold wrote the following in a widely-read article here at ReadWriteWeb about Facebook's Open Graph: "Time will tell where we land, but my gut is that positive things will come out of this. If nothing else, let's give Facebook credit for innovation and re-imagination the Web." Today he emphasized in speaking with me that Facebook is new to what it's just begun to do, but his company has been doing it for years. There's no guarantee that Facebook will get it right, he said. It's hard to say for sure that GetGlue has got it right, either. But as a work in progress, it's pretty darned good and today's new additions are very interesting. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It&#8217;s hard to keep up with all the newly released movies and music these days, but a lightweight social network with a whole lot of smarts under the hood says it can now offer you personalized recommendations of new releases that suit your very particular interests. GetGlue is a semantic web browser plug-in that has, for years, been smart enough to recognize when you&#8217;re looking at the same musical group across different websites, be that on Last.fm, MySpace or elsewhere. The service recently added a stream of recommendations of music, movies, books, magazines, wikipedia articles and other things you might like. How can it tell what you&#8217;ll like when something is brand new, though? Today the service has launched a &#8220;new releases&#8221; section, where human editors rush to classify brand-new media. Then the semantic robots can serve it up to the right users, still hot out of the oven. It&#8217;s pretty cool. Sponsor GetGlue founder Alex Iskold says he&#8217;s learned a lesson similar to what formerly automated tech news aggregator Techmeme has learned: algorithms and user generated content can take you a long way, but there comes a point when it&#8217;s good to hire some dedicated editors. The service asks you to like or unlike a wide variety of things. It then uses that feedback to build a taste profile to compare against things it finds put into its database and find the stuff it thinks you&#8217;ll like. That&#8217;s harder with new releases, though. &#8220;When something new is coming out, we don&#8217;t know what it&#8217;s like, so you need to have proffessionals tag it,&#8221; Iskold told us. &#8220;We have two editors on staff who look across the spectrum of new releases each week. They draw the similarities between things in a deep way &#8211; the tagging system we use will be unvieled later. We use really eclectic tags to characterize what kind of zombie or vampire movie something is. We also use tags brought in from other systems and our users find cool new things really fast.&#8221; The end result is a nicely displayed stream of big icons for personally recommended newly released movies, music and books. You think you&#8217;re hip to your scene now? Wait until you&#8217;ve got a network of contacts, a semantic robot and real human editors all working together to bring you the freshest content in your weird little niche. To be honest, I&#8217;ve been testing it out today by switching from new album recommendations on Glue over to Apple&#8217;s Lala.com , where it&#8217;s easy to listen to full albums once for free. That&#8217;s not the way Glue wants you to use it, but that&#8217;s the way I like to use it so far. The Down Side It&#8217;s an incredible system, when it works. GetGlue knows though that there are some challenges in this kind of game though. First, it&#8217;s not easy to present this kind of flow of data to users without either overwhelming them or boring them. Many of GetGlue&#8217;s latest changes are focused on making the user experience more pleasant: bigger images, collapsed bundles of shared items, etc. Can the service find a balance between giving you strong-enough recommendations on one hand and regularly offering up new recommendations on the other? In past versions of the product, I&#8217;ve received too few recommendations to keep me coming back. Hopefully new releases will scratch that itch. Iskold also says that after &#8220;liking&#8221; only 15 musical artists, I&#8217;m actually much less active than most of the 400,000 registered users of the service. Personally, I&#8217;m more drawn to the Wikipedia recommendations on GetGlue than anything else. The new releases in music might be roughly in the same sub-genres I usually listen to, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they are any good. Finally, all this &#8220;liking&#8221; obviously begs the Facebook question. Writing as an ostensible Facebook competitor about that giant network&#8217;s radical innovations unveiled last week, Iskold wrote the following in a widely-read article here at ReadWriteWeb about Facebook&#8217;s Open Graph: &#8220;Time will tell where we land, but my gut is that positive things will come out of this. If nothing else, let&#8217;s give Facebook credit for innovation and re-imagination the Web.&#8221; Today he emphasized in speaking with me that Facebook is new to what it&#8217;s just begun to do, but his company has been doing it for years. There&#8217;s no guarantee that Facebook will get it right, he said. It&#8217;s hard to say for sure that GetGlue has got it right, either. But as a work in progress, it&#8217;s pretty darned good and today&#8217;s new additions are very interesting. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.lsqha.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ec50fd5e1beedipi.jpg-142x150.jpg" title="GetGlue Adds New Releases to Recommendations Made by Human &amp; Machine" alt="ec50fd5e1beedipi.jpg 142x150 GetGlue Adds New Releases to Recommendations Made by Human &amp; Machine" /></p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/gQ1B5IxuPxE/getglue_adds_new_music_movie_book_recommendations.php" title="GetGlue Adds New Releases to Recommendations Made by Human &amp; Machine">GetGlue Adds New Releases to Recommendations Made by Human &amp; Machine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/getglue-adds-new-releases-to-recommendations-made-by-human-machine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android: Motorola Replaces Google&#8217;s Location Engine With Skyhook</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/android-motorola-replaces-googles-location-engine-with-skyhook</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/android-motorola-replaces-googles-location-engine-with-skyhook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adding-motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from-the-phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services-on-its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skyhook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/android-motorola-replaces-googles-location-engine-with-skyhook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tomorrow, Motorola will announce that it plans to replace Google's location services on its Android phones with Skyhook 's location engine. By default, all Android devices currently use Google's own location services to determine a phone's location based on GPS data from the phone and the location of nearby Wi-Fi access points and cellular towers. Skyhook, which pioneered this method to determine a device's location, made its name as the default location provider for Apple's iPhone and desktop operating systems. Adding Motorola to its partners will give Skyhook a strong foothold in the booming market for Android phones and applications. Sponsor Developers Won't Have to Change Anything The first Motorola devices with Skyhook's location services as the default will ship later this year. According to Skyhook, developers won't have to make any changes to their Android apps to work with Skyhook's location engine. Motorola will simply replace Google's libraries with Skyhook's Core Location services. As location becomes a more important part of a growing array of mobile apps, being able to quickly determine a phone's location even when inside and without a line of sight to the nearest GPS satellites becomes a necessity for developers. Skyhook, which launched in 2003, pioneered this system of using Wi-Fi access points to determine a device's location. Clearly, the engineers at Motorola felt that Skyhook's solution is currently superior to Google's services. Over the last few months, a number of the Android developers we talked to voiced frustration with the quality of Google's location services on Android. Indeed, some of the most popular location-based applications on Android like ShopSavvy and Flixster already use Skyhook's Android libraries instead of Google's built-in services. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Tomorrow, Motorola will announce that it plans to replace Google&#8217;s location services on its Android phones with Skyhook &#8216;s location engine. By default, all Android devices currently use Google&#8217;s own location services to determine a phone&#8217;s location based on GPS data from the phone and the location of nearby Wi-Fi access points and cellular towers. Skyhook, which pioneered this method to determine a device&#8217;s location, made its name as the default location provider for Apple&#8217;s iPhone and desktop operating systems. Adding Motorola to its partners will give Skyhook a strong foothold in the booming market for Android phones and applications. Sponsor Developers Won&#8217;t Have to Change Anything The first Motorola devices with Skyhook&#8217;s location services as the default will ship later this year. According to Skyhook, developers won&#8217;t have to make any changes to their Android apps to work with Skyhook&#8217;s location engine. Motorola will simply replace Google&#8217;s libraries with Skyhook&#8217;s Core Location services. As location becomes a more important part of a growing array of mobile apps, being able to quickly determine a phone&#8217;s location even when inside and without a line of sight to the nearest GPS satellites becomes a necessity for developers. Skyhook, which launched in 2003, pioneered this system of using Wi-Fi access points to determine a device&#8217;s location. Clearly, the engineers at Motorola felt that Skyhook&#8217;s solution is currently superior to Google&#8217;s services. Over the last few months, a number of the Android developers we talked to voiced frustration with the quality of Google&#8217;s location services on Android. Indeed, some of the most popular location-based applications on Android like ShopSavvy and Flixster already use Skyhook&#8217;s Android libraries instead of Google&#8217;s built-in services. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.lsqha.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/0abe00ac85jan09.jpg.jpg" title="Android: Motorola Replaces Googles Location Engine With Skyhook" alt="0abe00ac85jan09.jpg Android: Motorola Replaces Googles Location Engine With Skyhook" /></p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/V6U1v3dlBq8/motorola_will_replace_google_location_api_with_skyhook.php" title="Android: Motorola Replaces Google's Location Engine With Skyhook">Android: Motorola Replaces Google&#8217;s Location Engine With Skyhook</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/android-motorola-replaces-googles-location-engine-with-skyhook/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android Ported to iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/android-ported-to-iphone</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/android-ported-to-iphone#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port-forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretty-simple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-built-images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-porting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[works-on-first]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/android-ported-to-iphone</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hacker Planetbeing has apparently ported the Android to the iPhone. The Android OS is, in this video, apparently running successfully on the Apple phone. Planetbeing has offered the Android-to-iPhone " pre-built images and sources " as a torrent download For the time being, it looks like the porting only works on first-generation iPhones. Sponsor "It should be pretty simple to port forward to the iPhone 3G," says Planetbeing. "The 3GS will take more work. Hopefully with all this groundwork laid out, we can make Android a real alternative or supplement for iPhone users." As Alexander Vaughn points out on AppAdvice , "Just like you can do Bootcamp on your Mac to access PC apps, you'll be able to go on Android to try all these apps that don't exist, or were not allowed on the iPhone." Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hacker Planetbeing has apparently ported the Android to the iPhone. The Android OS is, in this video, apparently running successfully on the Apple phone. Planetbeing has offered the Android-to-iPhone &#8221; pre-built images and sources &#8221; as a torrent download For the time being, it looks like the porting only works on first-generation iPhones. Sponsor &#8220;It should be pretty simple to port forward to the iPhone 3G,&#8221; says Planetbeing. &#8220;The 3GS will take more work. Hopefully with all this groundwork laid out, we can make Android a real alternative or supplement for iPhone users.&#8221; As Alexander Vaughn points out on AppAdvice , &#8220;Just like you can do Bootcamp on your Mac to access PC apps, you&#8217;ll be able to go on Android to try all these apps that don&#8217;t exist, or were not allowed on the iPhone.&#8221; Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/iphone2.jpg" title="Android Ported to iPhone" alt="iphone2 Android Ported to iPhone" /></p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/VmH1pq3JhnY/android_ported_to_iphone.php" title="Android Ported to iPhone">Android Ported to iPhone</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/android-ported-to-iphone/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hands-On With Microsoft Docs.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/hands-on-with-microsoft-docs-com</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/hands-on-with-microsoft-docs-com#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/hands-on-with-microsoft-docs-com</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Earlier this week, Microsoft launched its Facebook connected online office suite Docs.com . Docs offers online versions of Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint. Users can also choose to share these documents with their Facebook friends. Overall, Docs falls somewhat short of being a replacement for a desktop office suite. Even though it offers a better interface than Google Docs and Zoho , its functionality often feels deliberately crippled in order to push users to use (and buy) Microsoft Office. Sponsor Word Web App Among the three tools in Docs, the Word web app comes the closest to fulfilling its promises. While it isn't ready for managing highly complex documents, it's more than sufficient for editing standard text documents collaboratively. The Word web app includes all the basic editing features one would expect from a stripped-down version of Word, but you can't add footnotes, for example, or insert tables from your Excel files. Thankfully, though, Word will not strip any of these features out of the file. Once you download the file or open it up in Word, your footnotes and will reappear. This ability of Word to keep a document's formatting shows that Microsoft deliberately chose not to support these features in the web app. Excel Web App Among all of the apps, the Excel app is the most basic of the three apps included in the suite. It can only read documents in Microsoft's Office 2007 format, for example, while all the other tools also support older formats. That, by itself, could be a show-stopper for some users, but the most egregious omission here is that there is no graphical interface for entering a formula. Instead, you have to type every formula by hand, which is a slow and error-prone process. The good news, though, is that the Excel web app can read all the formulas in imported files. It's clear, though, that the app is only really meant for editing existing documents and not for creating new ones. PowerPoint Web App The PowerPoint web app did a nice job at opening every PowerPoint file we threw at it. When it comes to editing, however, the app is also very stripped down. You can use it to create a basic outline of your presentation or change the order of your slieds, for example, but you can't add floating images, backgrounds and resize text and image fields. You can, however, add and edit SmartArt clips. Bugs While the whole office suite ran very well in all the browsers we tested (except for Safari on the iPad, which displayed the documents just fine but crashed when we tried to edit), Microsoft still has to fix before Docs can become a run-away hit. While Docs has no issues importing most Microsoft Office documents, editing uploaded documents can be tricky. If you set Microsoft Office on the desktop to track the changes you make to a document, for example, the web apps will refuse to let you edit the document. We also ran unto issues with image uploads, which, at times, didn't finish. Docs also often complained that the images we tried to upload were not compatible with Docs, even though they were just standard JPEGs. Verdict Microsoft clearly wants users to see Docs as an addition to the traditional Microsoft Office desktop suite and not as a replacement for Office. After using Docs for a while it quickly becomes obvious that a lot of the limitations Microsoft imposed are not due to the fact that Docs runs in the browser, but simply due to the fact that Microsoft didn't want to include them. While Microsoft is partnering with Facebook on this project, Docs feels like it is stuck between two worlds: the new reality of how people collaborate and share content online - and Microsoft's intent to preserve its old revenue streams for as long as possible. To some degree, Docs feels similar to Apple's office suite for the iPad . While Pages, Numbers and Keynote on the iPad are sufficient for most basic tasks and hold a lot of promise, users with more than the most basic needs will come away frustrated. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Earlier this week, Microsoft launched its Facebook connected online office suite Docs.com . Docs offers online versions of Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint. Users can also choose to share these documents with their Facebook friends. Overall, Docs falls somewhat short of being a replacement for a desktop office suite. Even though it offers a better interface than Google Docs and Zoho , its functionality often feels deliberately crippled in order to push users to use (and buy) Microsoft Office. Sponsor Word Web App Among the three tools in Docs, the Word web app comes the closest to fulfilling its promises. While it isn&#8217;t ready for managing highly complex documents, it&#8217;s more than sufficient for editing standard text documents collaboratively. The Word web app includes all the basic editing features one would expect from a stripped-down version of Word, but you can&#8217;t add footnotes, for example, or insert tables from your Excel files. Thankfully, though, Word will not strip any of these features out of the file. Once you download the file or open it up in Word, your footnotes and will reappear. This ability of Word to keep a document&#8217;s formatting shows that Microsoft deliberately chose not to support these features in the web app. Excel Web App Among all of the apps, the Excel app is the most basic of the three apps included in the suite. It can only read documents in Microsoft&#8217;s Office 2007 format, for example, while all the other tools also support older formats. That, by itself, could be a show-stopper for some users, but the most egregious omission here is that there is no graphical interface for entering a formula. Instead, you have to type every formula by hand, which is a slow and error-prone process. The good news, though, is that the Excel web app can read all the formulas in imported files. It&#8217;s clear, though, that the app is only really meant for editing existing documents and not for creating new ones. PowerPoint Web App The PowerPoint web app did a nice job at opening every PowerPoint file we threw at it. When it comes to editing, however, the app is also very stripped down. You can use it to create a basic outline of your presentation or change the order of your slieds, for example, but you can&#8217;t add floating images, backgrounds and resize text and image fields. You can, however, add and edit SmartArt clips. Bugs While the whole office suite ran very well in all the browsers we tested (except for Safari on the iPad, which displayed the documents just fine but crashed when we tried to edit), Microsoft still has to fix before Docs can become a run-away hit. While Docs has no issues importing most Microsoft Office documents, editing uploaded documents can be tricky. If you set Microsoft Office on the desktop to track the changes you make to a document, for example, the web apps will refuse to let you edit the document. We also ran unto issues with image uploads, which, at times, didn&#8217;t finish. Docs also often complained that the images we tried to upload were not compatible with Docs, even though they were just standard JPEGs. Verdict Microsoft clearly wants users to see Docs as an addition to the traditional Microsoft Office desktop suite and not as a replacement for Office. After using Docs for a while it quickly becomes obvious that a lot of the limitations Microsoft imposed are not due to the fact that Docs runs in the browser, but simply due to the fact that Microsoft didn&#8217;t want to include them. While Microsoft is partnering with Facebook on this project, Docs feels like it is stuck between two worlds: the new reality of how people collaborate and share content online &#8211; and Microsoft&#8217;s intent to preserve its old revenue streams for as long as possible. To some degree, Docs feels similar to Apple&#8217;s office suite for the iPad . While Pages, Numbers and Keynote on the iPad are sufficient for most basic tasks and hold a lot of promise, users with more than the most basic needs will come away frustrated. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.lsqha.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/c2e2364142apr10.jpg.jpg" title="Hands On With Microsoft Docs.com" alt="c2e2364142apr10.jpg Hands On With Microsoft Docs.com" /></p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/Ii1fkqUzVw4/hands-on_with_microsofts_online_office_suite_docs_com.php" title="Hands-On With Microsoft Docs.com">Hands-On With Microsoft Docs.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/hands-on-with-microsoft-docs-com/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stats: iPad Users Consume 3X Videos As Other Users</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/stats-ipad-users-consume-3x-videos-as-other-users</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/stats-ipad-users-consume-3x-videos-as-other-users#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[despite-the-now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedia-network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MeFeedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-the-past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[show-the-ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users-consume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos-as-web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/stats-ipad-users-consume-3x-videos-as-other-users</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Despite the now infamous absence of Adboe's Flash, video aggregator MeFeedia says that video on the iPad is a flourishing and growing trend according to the data the company has collected over the past three weeks. The company offers a few stats and postulates that, among other reasons, the "lack of distractions mean people watch more video, for longer." Sponsor MeFeedia added HTML5 video support earlier this month - one of several alternatives available for video on the iPad - and says that its internal numbers show the iPad to clearly be a media consumption device, moreso than other users. The company offers the following observations on its blog, noting that the "iPad was only launched a few weeks ago &#038; this sample is for MeFeedia and MeFeedia Network only." iPad is now the 5th most popular mobile device* *In terms of unique users, trailing only iPhone, iPod Touch, SymbianOS, and Android (in that order) iPad users consume 3X as many videos as web users (up from the 2.5X number that we first reported a few weeks ago) iPad users spend 4X as long watching videos as web users (up from 3X) iPad users consume 5X as many videos as iPhone users (up from 3X) We think that the lack of multitasking as a reason for people to watch more video, longer, is likely a fair point. And, as we've previously argued , the iPad makes a great media consumption (rather than creation) device. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Despite the now infamous absence of Adboe&#8217;s Flash, video aggregator MeFeedia says that video on the iPad is a flourishing and growing trend according to the data the company has collected over the past three weeks. The company offers a few stats and postulates that, among other reasons, the &#8220;lack of distractions mean people watch more video, for longer.&#8221; Sponsor MeFeedia added HTML5 video support earlier this month &#8211; one of several alternatives available for video on the iPad &#8211; and says that its internal numbers show the iPad to clearly be a media consumption device, moreso than other users. The company offers the following observations on its blog, noting that the &#8220;iPad was only launched a few weeks ago &#038; this sample is for MeFeedia and MeFeedia Network only.&#8221; iPad is now the 5th most popular mobile device* *In terms of unique users, trailing only iPhone, iPod Touch, SymbianOS, and Android (in that order) iPad users consume 3X as many videos as web users (up from the 2.5X number that we first reported a few weeks ago) iPad users spend 4X as long watching videos as web users (up from 3X) iPad users consume 5X as many videos as iPhone users (up from 3X) We think that the lack of multitasking as a reason for people to watch more video, longer, is likely a fair point. And, as we&#8217;ve previously argued , the iPad makes a great media consumption (rather than creation) device. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/ipad-150-device.jpg" title="Stats: iPad Users Consume 3X Videos As Other Users" alt="ipad 150 device Stats: iPad Users Consume 3X Videos As Other Users" /></p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/tkuSUPKuNFM/stats_ipad_users_consume_3x_videos_as_other_users.php" title="Stats: iPad Users Consume 3X Videos As Other Users">Stats: iPad Users Consume 3X Videos As Other Users</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/stats-ipad-users-consume-3x-videos-as-other-users/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt Gushes About HTML 5</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/googles-eric-schmidt-gushes-about-html-5</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/googles-eric-schmidt-gushes-about-html-5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst-jeffrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-david]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/googles-eric-schmidt-gushes-about-html-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Forrester Research is recommending developers continue developing rich Internet applications and take long pause before embracing HTML 5. For Forrester, HTML 5 is still many years away from becoming a standard in the market and fully functional across multiple platforms. The analyst recommendation reflects on Google's mobile strategy, which CEO Eric Schmidt says is rooted in the company's support for HTML 5. This topic is of real interest now as Apple has dropped support for Adobe Flash. Google is forging ahead with support for HTML 5 but is also playing all sides as Flash remains the incumbent technology for online video. Sponsor So though its commitment is to HTML 5, the company still faces the reality that adoption for platforms such as .NET remain high. Analyst Jeffrey Hammond writes in his report : "These trends underline a key hurdle that HTML 5 technology must overcome to be a ready substitute for today's RIA platform options; users expect it to be as low cost as the other options, but to be of use it must also integrate with Java and .NET server technology. Even if HTML 5 turns out to be a great spec when it reaches Candidate Recommendation state in 2012, it's not clear that this alone will be enough to reverse current RIA adoption trends." In the meantime, Google is debating if it should develop native applications for different platforms. A Google Docs product manager said to us recently that the company has not decided if they should invest in native applications for different mobile platforms. Last week at Google Atmosphere, Schmidt was emphatic about Google's interest in HTML 5. Also at Google Atmosphere, Google Apps President David Girouard moderated a discussion that touched on the HTML 5 issue. In Vint Cerf's view, the "Internet of Things," will evolve to the point where more "things," will go on the smart grid. Speeds will increase at the edges of the network, making downloads to a web page almost simultaneous. What this seems to mean is that we will see the borders between apps and the Web dissolve. There may even be the evolution of new networks that are different than the Web itself. In view of what they say, there is no clear dismissal of different platforms. It's more how mobile apps and the Web blend together. Forrester is critical of the draft HTML 5 spec. Hammond states cites the deep developer use of existing rich Internet application platforms. From his report: "Will HTML 5 make rich Internet application (RIA) technologies such as Adobe Flash/Flex and Microsoft Silverlight obsolete? For at least the next five years, the answer is a definite "no"; inconsistent implementations of the draft HTML 5 specification and immature tooling make building HTML 5 apps that work consistently across browsers and operating systems a real challenge. Furthermore, this "either/ or" scenario is driven only by vendor politics, not by developer realities. Ultimately, HTML 5 and RIA platforms will be complementary technologies, and enterprise development shops will need to invest in both approaches to deliver expressive applications that combine reach and richness." It is a little tiring when we hear the war of words over apps versus the Web. What will win? Probably neither. It will just depend on the demands of the market, the views of the developer and the powers they decide to follow. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Forrester Research is recommending developers continue developing rich Internet applications and take long pause before embracing HTML 5. For Forrester, HTML 5 is still many years away from becoming a standard in the market and fully functional across multiple platforms. The analyst recommendation reflects on Google&#8217;s mobile strategy, which CEO Eric Schmidt says is rooted in the company&#8217;s support for HTML 5. This topic is of real interest now as Apple has dropped support for Adobe Flash. Google is forging ahead with support for HTML 5 but is also playing all sides as Flash remains the incumbent technology for online video. Sponsor So though its commitment is to HTML 5, the company still faces the reality that adoption for platforms such as .NET remain high. Analyst Jeffrey Hammond writes in his report : &#8220;These trends underline a key hurdle that HTML 5 technology must overcome to be a ready substitute for today&#8217;s RIA platform options; users expect it to be as low cost as the other options, but to be of use it must also integrate with Java and .NET server technology. Even if HTML 5 turns out to be a great spec when it reaches Candidate Recommendation state in 2012, it&#8217;s not clear that this alone will be enough to reverse current RIA adoption trends.&#8221; In the meantime, Google is debating if it should develop native applications for different platforms. A Google Docs product manager said to us recently that the company has not decided if they should invest in native applications for different mobile platforms. Last week at Google Atmosphere, Schmidt was emphatic about Google&#8217;s interest in HTML 5. Also at Google Atmosphere, Google Apps President David Girouard moderated a discussion that touched on the HTML 5 issue. In Vint Cerf&#8217;s view, the &#8220;Internet of Things,&#8221; will evolve to the point where more &#8220;things,&#8221; will go on the smart grid. Speeds will increase at the edges of the network, making downloads to a web page almost simultaneous. What this seems to mean is that we will see the borders between apps and the Web dissolve. There may even be the evolution of new networks that are different than the Web itself. In view of what they say, there is no clear dismissal of different platforms. It&#8217;s more how mobile apps and the Web blend together. Forrester is critical of the draft HTML 5 spec. Hammond states cites the deep developer use of existing rich Internet application platforms. From his report: &#8220;Will HTML 5 make rich Internet application (RIA) technologies such as Adobe Flash/Flex and Microsoft Silverlight obsolete? For at least the next five years, the answer is a definite &#8220;no&#8221;; inconsistent implementations of the draft HTML 5 specification and immature tooling make building HTML 5 apps that work consistently across browsers and operating systems a real challenge. Furthermore, this &#8220;either/ or&#8221; scenario is driven only by vendor politics, not by developer realities. Ultimately, HTML 5 and RIA platforms will be complementary technologies, and enterprise development shops will need to invest in both approaches to deliver expressive applications that combine reach and richness.&#8221; It is a little tiring when we hear the war of words over apps versus the Web. What will win? Probably neither. It will just depend on the demands of the market, the views of the developer and the powers they decide to follow. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cloud/assets_c/2010/04/eric_schmidt_lg-thumb-150x99-16699.jpg" title="Googles Eric Schmidt Gushes About HTML 5" alt="eric schmidt lg thumb 150x99 16699 Googles Eric Schmidt Gushes About HTML 5" /></p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/QoMJzI3uoCU/googles-eric-schmidt-says-mobi.php" title="Google's Eric Schmidt Gushes About HTML 5">Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt Gushes About HTML 5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/googles-eric-schmidt-gushes-about-html-5/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Apple Booting iAd&#8217;s Competition from the iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/is-apple-booting-iads-competition-from-the-iphone</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/is-apple-booting-iads-competition-from-the-iphone#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iAd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sponsor developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/is-apple-booting-iads-competition-from-the-iphone</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ At the most recent Apple keynote , Steve Jobs announced Apple's upcoming advertising platform called iAd . Included as a part of the OS 4.0 update, the mobile operating system upgrade due out for iPhone this summer and iPad later this fall, the iAd system aims, in its very Apple-ly way, to make mobile advertisements "delightful," meaning ads worth clicking on, engaging with and viewing. What Jobs didn't mention, though, is how Apple plans to give iAd its head start: by kicking out the competing analytics and advertising platforms now thriving in nearly every iPhone app today. Or so it seems. Sponsor Developer Reports App Store Rejection Due to Analytics Inclusion Last week, technology news blog VentureBeat caught wind of a story where Apple had rejected an iPhone application because it, according to the email sent to the developer, "is not appropriate for applications to gather user analytics." Not appropriate, you may ask? Since when? Apparently since Apple released their updated iPhone Developer Agreement. Alongside the SDK 4 beta , made available shortly after the announcement in early April, the developer contract was updated, too. Specifically, the clause in question, section 3.3.9, reads, in part (more here ): Notwithstanding anything else in this Agreement, Device Data may not be provided or disclosed to a third party without Apple's prior written consent. Accordingly, the use of third party software in Your Application to collect and send Device Data to a third party for processing or analysis is expressly prohibited. To date, the changes detailed in this clause have been overshadowed by the one preceding it - in Section 3.3.1, Apple banned the use of cross-compiler tools for building iPhone applications, like the one Adobe was just about to ship , for example. But in the long run, it's Section 3.3.9 that may have more impact on the industry as a whole. "FEAR" You may have not heard too much about this change because no one actually knows what's going on thanks to Apple's par-for-the-course policy of refusing to clarify its meaning. Plus, the companies who may be the most heavily affected by an analytics ban - services like Flurry , MediaLets , Motally , Localytics , and SimpleGeo , to name a few - don't want to talk about it. On record that is. But after a dozen or so phone calls and emails, we're starting to see a picture forming and it can be summed up in one word: FEAR . "Nobody wants to be the canary in the coal mine," one source told us, referring to the radio silence we're getting from these companies when you would have otherwise expected to hear outcry, or perhaps even anti-competitive claims. Some companies, off-record, say they are afraid to complain . If they do, they could be the next to be banned. Another source reported that a number of their company's clients weren't submitting updates to the iTunes Application Store because they were worried that the updates, with the analytics included of course, would be rejected. Instead, the clients are leaving their older applications in place since it doesn't appear that Apple is going back through all the current apps and booting out those that already include analytics within them. "Maybe the older apps are grandfathered in?" they wondered aloud. The fact that no one knows, not even the big name, big box retailer that sits at the top of the latter's client list, is a testament to how Apple likes to do business. Here's the agreement, read it and sign it...and that's the extent of the communication. As to those who did manage to get someone from Apple to talk about it? The answer was simply: "read the agreement." But if Apple holds true to what's written there, it sounds like it could spell doom for mobile analytics and ad firms, especially the small-time players beloved by independent developers. iAd, Anti-Competitive? What no one will say - again, on record, that is - is that the changes have a whiff of anti-competitive behavior to them. The issue at hand: Apple is preparing to launch iAd, an advertising platform based on the newly-acquired Quattro Wireless, a second choice for Apple after the Admob deal fell through. "We tried to buy AdMob, but Google snatched them up because they didn't want us to have them," Steve Jobs said during the April keynote. "So we bought another smaller company, Quattro. But we're babes in the woods." Some say that the added language to section 3.3.9 is a direct shot at AdMob in the same way that the changes in 3.3.1 were a shot at Adobe. That is, instead of allowing Google to get its mobile advertisements onto the iPhone, Apple can keep them out via the new analytics/ad ban. Whether or not that's the case is certainly up for debate. But considering that the Google/AdMob deal is still being researched by U.S. antitrust enforcers, regulators aware of the issue. Word has it that Google even pointed it out to the FTC, just in case. Continue Reading: Next page, "A Second Opinion" A Second Opinion: Privacy Concerns Others, however, say these changes aren't really about analytics, ads and anti-competitive behavior as much as they are about privacy concerns. In speaking with Alan Chapell, chairman of the Mobile Marketing Association Privacy Committee and whose firm advises companies on privacy and data strategy, the changes to Apple's agreement have to do more with consumer privacy than anything else. With language that refers to "geo-location" and targeted advertising, a good bit of Section 3.3.9 is about how location-based applications should behave. With the rise of location-based services especially and location-based social tools like Loopt, Foursquare, Gowalla, and others, privacy is at the forefront of everyone's minds these days. ( Including ours ). There are no standards for location based data yet, Chapell explains. No rules about how such data should be used, retained, shared and so on. In addition, Apple is under heavy pressure from regulators to protect the privacy of its customers. And if the third-party analytics providers do something which comprises that privacy, it will be Apple that gets in trouble. "This debate is about privacy and innovation," Chapell notes, "and finding a balance between the two." Unfortunately, even if Apple chooses never to enforce the new rules, explains Chapell, the changes will have an indirect impact on innovation in this area. The next round of ad networks, analytics providers and other in-app data-sharing tools will be less likely to be funded. Not Just Funding at Risk... These changes won't just affect the funding of services like those noted above, though, they could affect how services are developed for the iPhone. Take for example, Xtify , a location-triggered geo-messaging system now available for Android ( previous coverage ).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> At the most recent Apple keynote , Steve Jobs announced Apple&#8217;s upcoming advertising platform called iAd . Included as a part of the OS 4.0 update, the mobile operating system upgrade due out for iPhone this summer and iPad later this fall, the iAd system aims, in its very Apple-ly way, to make mobile advertisements &#8220;delightful,&#8221; meaning ads worth clicking on, engaging with and viewing. What Jobs didn&#8217;t mention, though, is how Apple plans to give iAd its head start: by kicking out the competing analytics and advertising platforms now thriving in nearly every iPhone app today. Or so it seems. Sponsor Developer Reports App Store Rejection Due to Analytics Inclusion Last week, technology news blog VentureBeat caught wind of a story where Apple had rejected an iPhone application because it, according to the email sent to the developer, &#8220;is not appropriate for applications to gather user analytics.&#8221; Not appropriate, you may ask? Since when? Apparently since Apple released their updated iPhone Developer Agreement. Alongside the SDK 4 beta , made available shortly after the announcement in early April, the developer contract was updated, too. Specifically, the clause in question, section 3.3.9, reads, in part (more here ): Notwithstanding anything else in this Agreement, Device Data may not be provided or disclosed to a third party without Apple&#8217;s prior written consent. Accordingly, the use of third party software in Your Application to collect and send Device Data to a third party for processing or analysis is expressly prohibited. To date, the changes detailed in this clause have been overshadowed by the one preceding it &#8211; in Section 3.3.1, Apple banned the use of cross-compiler tools for building iPhone applications, like the one Adobe was just about to ship , for example. But in the long run, it&#8217;s Section 3.3.9 that may have more impact on the industry as a whole. &#8220;FEAR&#8221; You may have not heard too much about this change because no one actually knows what&#8217;s going on thanks to Apple&#8217;s par-for-the-course policy of refusing to clarify its meaning. Plus, the companies who may be the most heavily affected by an analytics ban &#8211; services like Flurry , MediaLets , Motally , Localytics , and SimpleGeo , to name a few &#8211; don&#8217;t want to talk about it. On record that is. But after a dozen or so phone calls and emails, we&#8217;re starting to see a picture forming and it can be summed up in one word: FEAR . &#8220;Nobody wants to be the canary in the coal mine,&#8221; one source told us, referring to the radio silence we&#8217;re getting from these companies when you would have otherwise expected to hear outcry, or perhaps even anti-competitive claims. Some companies, off-record, say they are afraid to complain . If they do, they could be the next to be banned. Another source reported that a number of their company&#8217;s clients weren&#8217;t submitting updates to the iTunes Application Store because they were worried that the updates, with the analytics included of course, would be rejected. Instead, the clients are leaving their older applications in place since it doesn&#8217;t appear that Apple is going back through all the current apps and booting out those that already include analytics within them. &#8220;Maybe the older apps are grandfathered in?&#8221; they wondered aloud. The fact that no one knows, not even the big name, big box retailer that sits at the top of the latter&#8217;s client list, is a testament to how Apple likes to do business. Here&#8217;s the agreement, read it and sign it&#8230;and that&#8217;s the extent of the communication. As to those who did manage to get someone from Apple to talk about it? The answer was simply: &#8220;read the agreement.&#8221; But if Apple holds true to what&#8217;s written there, it sounds like it could spell doom for mobile analytics and ad firms, especially the small-time players beloved by independent developers. iAd, Anti-Competitive? What no one will say &#8211; again, on record, that is &#8211; is that the changes have a whiff of anti-competitive behavior to them. The issue at hand: Apple is preparing to launch iAd, an advertising platform based on the newly-acquired Quattro Wireless, a second choice for Apple after the Admob deal fell through. &#8220;We tried to buy AdMob, but Google snatched them up because they didn&#8217;t want us to have them,&#8221; Steve Jobs said during the April keynote. &#8220;So we bought another smaller company, Quattro. But we&#8217;re babes in the woods.&#8221; Some say that the added language to section 3.3.9 is a direct shot at AdMob in the same way that the changes in 3.3.1 were a shot at Adobe. That is, instead of allowing Google to get its mobile advertisements onto the iPhone, Apple can keep them out via the new analytics/ad ban. Whether or not that&#8217;s the case is certainly up for debate. But considering that the Google/AdMob deal is still being researched by U.S. antitrust enforcers, regulators aware of the issue. Word has it that Google even pointed it out to the FTC, just in case. Continue Reading: Next page, &#8220;A Second Opinion&#8221; A Second Opinion: Privacy Concerns Others, however, say these changes aren&#8217;t really about analytics, ads and anti-competitive behavior as much as they are about privacy concerns. In speaking with Alan Chapell, chairman of the Mobile Marketing Association Privacy Committee and whose firm advises companies on privacy and data strategy, the changes to Apple&#8217;s agreement have to do more with consumer privacy than anything else. With language that refers to &#8220;geo-location&#8221; and targeted advertising, a good bit of Section 3.3.9 is about how location-based applications should behave. With the rise of location-based services especially and location-based social tools like Loopt, Foursquare, Gowalla, and others, privacy is at the forefront of everyone&#8217;s minds these days. ( Including ours ). There are no standards for location based data yet, Chapell explains. No rules about how such data should be used, retained, shared and so on. In addition, Apple is under heavy pressure from regulators to protect the privacy of its customers. And if the third-party analytics providers do something which comprises that privacy, it will be Apple that gets in trouble. &#8220;This debate is about privacy and innovation,&#8221; Chapell notes, &#8220;and finding a balance between the two.&#8221; Unfortunately, even if Apple chooses never to enforce the new rules, explains Chapell, the changes will have an indirect impact on innovation in this area. The next round of ad networks, analytics providers and other in-app data-sharing tools will be less likely to be funded. Not Just Funding at Risk&#8230; These changes won&#8217;t just affect the funding of services like those noted above, though, they could affect how services are developed for the iPhone. Take for example, Xtify , a location-triggered geo-messaging system now available for Android ( previous coverage ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/is-apple-booting-iads-competition-from-the-iphone/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Keep Tabs on Facebook&#8217;s F8 from Afar</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/how-to-keep-tabs-on-facebooks-f8-from-afar</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/how-to-keep-tabs-on-facebooks-f8-from-afar#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convenience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook-plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inside-facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kirkpatrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other-websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-on-sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timeline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/how-to-keep-tabs-on-facebooks-f8-from-afar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Facebook's F8 developer conference starts today and, even if I had a plane ticket, I couldn't be there. The same went for Twitter's Chirp conference last week and the iPhone OS 4.0 release the week before that. It just wasn't in the stars and, more importantly, the budget - but that's what technology is for, right? On that point, we'd like to look at a few ways you can keep up with the news coming out of today's F8 conference and other events you might not be able to attend in person but want to watch, in real-time, nonetheless. And for your convenience, we've embedded streaming video of the F8 Keynote after the jump. Sponsor First, for more less secretive events like today's F8 conference, there's the fully authorized, sponsored live-streaming video . And often a search on sites like UStream and Justin.tv get a number of somewhat shaky but nonetheless informative smartphone videos of the events. Often, these sites are the place to go for streaming video of less open events, like most any of Apple's clamped-down product releases. Then there's the old faithful hashtag, the identifier that shows you tweets that are (supposedly) related to the same topic, though sometimes fall short on that point. And lets not forget any number of live blogs. But beyond all of these standard tools, we were reminded of an aggregator of all these different ways of remotely monitoring a real-time event that's been around for a bit more than a year now and is just as useful as ever - Almost.at . Almost.at is a sweet looking tool written in Cappuccino by David Cann for the express purpose of "Following People at Real-World Events in Real-Time". The service can be used on the web or in a standalone browser for Mac OSX 10.5+ and gathers all the content it can about a specific event from a number of services: Twitter , Flickr , YouTube , TwitPic , TinyURL and Bit.ly . Streaming in real-time, Almost.at shows a number of different events in the left-most column, pulls in related tweets in the next, pictures and videos after that, and then related articles and external links in the final column. Even better, the web app offers a minute by minute timeline at the bottom of the screen, showing when the conversation was most active and allowing you to browse everything by the timeline. So, while we'll certainly be keeping an eye on our own cultivated lists of who's who on Twitter, Almost.at will likely be the main browser tab we keep open alongside the live-streaming broadcast that we've embedded at the end of this post. But before you get to watching today's F8 conference, you may want to catch up on what we're expecting, so here are a few links to that end: Om Malik's F8 Preview explains "How Facebook Plans to Take Over The Web". Marshall Kirkpatrick anticipates that a Facebook Firehose May Be Released at Developer Conference F8 . Inside Facebook's Eric Eldon also gives a round-up of all the rumors leading up to the F8 conference that helps put everything in context. Marshall Kirkpatrick also expects that Facebook May Launch Recommendation Service For Other Websites . Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Facebook&#8217;s F8 developer conference starts today and, even if I had a plane ticket, I couldn&#8217;t be there. The same went for Twitter&#8217;s Chirp conference last week and the iPhone OS 4.0 release the week before that. It just wasn&#8217;t in the stars and, more importantly, the budget &#8211; but that&#8217;s what technology is for, right? On that point, we&#8217;d like to look at a few ways you can keep up with the news coming out of today&#8217;s F8 conference and other events you might not be able to attend in person but want to watch, in real-time, nonetheless. And for your convenience, we&#8217;ve embedded streaming video of the F8 Keynote after the jump. Sponsor First, for more less secretive events like today&#8217;s F8 conference, there&#8217;s the fully authorized, sponsored live-streaming video . And often a search on sites like UStream and Justin.tv get a number of somewhat shaky but nonetheless informative smartphone videos of the events. Often, these sites are the place to go for streaming video of less open events, like most any of Apple&#8217;s clamped-down product releases. Then there&#8217;s the old faithful hashtag, the identifier that shows you tweets that are (supposedly) related to the same topic, though sometimes fall short on that point. And lets not forget any number of live blogs. But beyond all of these standard tools, we were reminded of an aggregator of all these different ways of remotely monitoring a real-time event that&#8217;s been around for a bit more than a year now and is just as useful as ever &#8211; Almost.at . Almost.at is a sweet looking tool written in Cappuccino by David Cann for the express purpose of &#8220;Following People at Real-World Events in Real-Time&#8221;. The service can be used on the web or in a standalone browser for Mac OSX 10.5+ and gathers all the content it can about a specific event from a number of services: Twitter , Flickr , YouTube , TwitPic , TinyURL and Bit.ly . Streaming in real-time, Almost.at shows a number of different events in the left-most column, pulls in related tweets in the next, pictures and videos after that, and then related articles and external links in the final column. Even better, the web app offers a minute by minute timeline at the bottom of the screen, showing when the conversation was most active and allowing you to browse everything by the timeline. So, while we&#8217;ll certainly be keeping an eye on our own cultivated lists of who&#8217;s who on Twitter, Almost.at will likely be the main browser tab we keep open alongside the live-streaming broadcast that we&#8217;ve embedded at the end of this post. But before you get to watching today&#8217;s F8 conference, you may want to catch up on what we&#8217;re expecting, so here are a few links to that end: Om Malik&#8217;s F8 Preview explains &#8220;How Facebook Plans to Take Over The Web&#8221;. Marshall Kirkpatrick anticipates that a Facebook Firehose May Be Released at Developer Conference F8 . Inside Facebook&#8217;s Eric Eldon also gives a round-up of all the rumors leading up to the F8 conference that helps put everything in context. Marshall Kirkpatrick also expects that Facebook May Launch Recommendation Service For Other Websites . Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.lsqha.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/69c00f68dfmar09.png.png" title="How to Keep Tabs on Facebooks F8 from Afar" alt="69c00f68dfmar09.png How to Keep Tabs on Facebooks F8 from Afar" /></p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/r9ZJsSfymq4/how_to_keep_up_with_facebooks_f8_developer_confere.php" title="How to Keep Tabs on Facebook's F8 from Afar">How to Keep Tabs on Facebook&#8217;s F8 from Afar</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/how-to-keep-tabs-on-facebooks-f8-from-afar/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Announces Second-Quarter Earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/apple-announces-second-quarter-earnings</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/apple-announces-second-quarter-earnings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13-50-billion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimating-low]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expect-diluted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal-quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales-accounted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonny-hung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-quarter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/apple-announces-second-quarter-earnings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Apple announced second-quarter revenue of $13.50 billion today for the quarter ended March 27, 2010. Net quarterly profit was $3.07 billion, or $3.33 per diluted share. Q2 2009 showed revenue of $9.08 billion and net quarterly profit of $1.62 billion, or $1.79 per diluted share. International sales accounted for 58 percent of the quarter's revenue. 2.94 million Macs were sold, a 33% increase, along with 8.75 million iPhones and 10.89 million iPods. Sponsor "Looking ahead to the third fiscal quarter of 2010, we expect revenue in the range of about $13.0 billion to $13.4 billion and we expect diluted earnings per share in the range of about $2.28 to $2.39," said Peter Oppenheimer, Apple's CFO, in an official statement . Apple CEO Steve Jobs stated it was the company's "best non-holiday quarter ever, with revenues up 49 percent and profits up 90 percent." Apple has a reputation on Wall Street for estimating low on its upcoming revenue, which has an influence on analyst expectations. Apple currently anticipates a gross margin of 36 percent, a significant decline. Apple beat analyst expectations this quarter. Although attention on the iPad was enormous, and sales were good , insufficient time has passed to tell what effect that new product will have on earnings. It will need to sell a great many to be a contender against any of its other products. Bottom photo by Sonny Hung Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Apple announced second-quarter revenue of $13.50 billion today for the quarter ended March 27, 2010. Net quarterly profit was $3.07 billion, or $3.33 per diluted share. Q2 2009 showed revenue of $9.08 billion and net quarterly profit of $1.62 billion, or $1.79 per diluted share. International sales accounted for 58 percent of the quarter&#8217;s revenue. 2.94 million Macs were sold, a 33% increase, along with 8.75 million iPhones and 10.89 million iPods. Sponsor &#8220;Looking ahead to the third fiscal quarter of 2010, we expect revenue in the range of about $13.0 billion to $13.4 billion and we expect diluted earnings per share in the range of about $2.28 to $2.39,&#8221; said Peter Oppenheimer, Apple&#8217;s CFO, in an official statement . Apple CEO Steve Jobs stated it was the company&#8217;s &#8220;best non-holiday quarter ever, with revenues up 49 percent and profits up 90 percent.&#8221; Apple has a reputation on Wall Street for estimating low on its upcoming revenue, which has an influence on analyst expectations. Apple currently anticipates a gross margin of 36 percent, a significant decline. Apple beat analyst expectations this quarter. Although attention on the iPad was enormous, and sales were good , insufficient time has passed to tell what effect that new product will have on earnings. It will need to sell a great many to be a contender against any of its other products. Bottom photo by Sonny Hung Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/apple-logo1.jpg" title="Apple Announces Second Quarter Earnings" alt="apple logo1 Apple Announces Second Quarter Earnings" /></p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/1h1LZZW_Ubk/apple_announces_second-quarter_earnings.php" title="Apple Announces Second-Quarter Earnings">Apple Announces Second-Quarter Earnings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/apple-announces-second-quarter-earnings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Snaps Up Agnilux, Whatever That Is</title>
		<link>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/google-snaps-up-agnilux-whatever-that-is</link>
		<comments>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/google-snaps-up-agnilux-whatever-that-is#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agnilux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amarjit gill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraordinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theoretical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lsqha.com/uncategorized/google-snaps-up-agnilux-whatever-that-is</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Google has purchased Agnilux, a chip startup run by Apple refugees. After P.A. Semi was bought by Apple in 2008 for $278 million, several of the prime movers of that company, including Amarjit Gill, Executive VP of Sales and Business Development, along with several Apple employees, jumped ship and started Agnilux. A former Tivo executive also joined the company. P.A. Semi produces the chips that run the iPhone and iPad. Speculation has surrounded the theoretical Apple intel that might come with the company, the entertainment media background of some of its executives and the extraordinary secrecy of Agnilux. Sponsor Despite investigation by the New York Times , very little information is available on the company. In February, NYT talked about the company's website. That website no longer exists. When it did it had little information. "Hop over to the Agnilux Web site and you're told very little about the company beyond the location of its offices and the derivation of the company's name. Agni is Sanskrit for fire and Lux is the Latin for light." An anonymous source told the Times he thought the company was producing a server. Prior to accepting the Google deal, Agnilux held conversations with Cisco, Microsoft and Texas Instruments. It's uncertain whether they spoke with VCs or other investors. Discuss ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Google has purchased Agnilux, a chip startup run by Apple refugees. After P.A. Semi was bought by Apple in 2008 for $278 million, several of the prime movers of that company, including Amarjit Gill, Executive VP of Sales and Business Development, along with several Apple employees, jumped ship and started Agnilux. A former Tivo executive also joined the company. P.A. Semi produces the chips that run the iPhone and iPad. Speculation has surrounded the theoretical Apple intel that might come with the company, the entertainment media background of some of its executives and the extraordinary secrecy of Agnilux. Sponsor Despite investigation by the New York Times , very little information is available on the company. In February, NYT talked about the company&#8217;s website. That website no longer exists. When it did it had little information. &#8220;Hop over to the Agnilux Web site and you&#8217;re told very little about the company beyond the location of its offices and the derivation of the company&#8217;s name. Agni is Sanskrit for fire and Lux is the Latin for light.&#8221; An anonymous source told the Times he thought the company was producing a server. Prior to accepting the Google deal, Agnilux held conversations with Cisco, Microsoft and Texas Instruments. It&#8217;s uncertain whether they spoke with VCs or other investors. Discuss </p>
<p><img src="http://www.lsqha.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/15919b3b64acer_x.jpg-150x123.jpg" title="Google Snaps Up Agnilux, Whatever That Is" alt="15919b3b64acer x.jpg 150x123 Google Snaps Up Agnilux, Whatever That Is" /></p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/snU5Zx2jBWk/google_snaps_up_agnilux.php" title="Google Snaps Up Agnilux, Whatever That Is">Google Snaps Up Agnilux, Whatever That Is</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lsqha.com/social-media/google-snaps-up-agnilux-whatever-that-is/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
